Abnerd Joseph: selected public records

Abnerd Joseph: selected public records relating to Smith v. Charles, et al., Case No. 2024-L-010547, Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois.

Chicago Police Report on Shooting at 60 E. Monroe Street (The Legacy) 14 September 2023 JG424436 CSup ID 1642566: includes Abnerd Joseph toxicology

FOIA-accessible Chicago Police Report JG424436 CSup ID 1642566 (excerpts)
FOIA-accessible Chicago Police Report JG424436 CSup ID 1642566 (full redacted PDF)
Excerpts
"toxicology results [for the decedent] revealed the following substances: 11-Hydroxy Delta-9 THC, Amphetamine (Adderall etc), Benzoylecgonine (cocaine derivative), Delta-9 Carboxy THC, and Delta-9 THC."
Accoring to Witness F "[decedent] then rushed toward [witness A] and began to strike him about the head and body. [Witness A] tried to fend off the attack and began to retreat. At some point, [witness A] ended up behind [witness F] and [decedent] then struck [witness F] one time in the face causing him to fall to the ground. [Witness F] believed he was 'knocked out" for a bit of time.
"[witness C] related to responding officers that he heard a disturbance through the door and heard someone say, 'I will shoot.'"
Witness A "stated the male Black 'punched the shooter, and the shooter fired four to five shots'"
"[Witness D] related he and his wife were headed to dinner and pressed the elevator button to leave the 48th floor. [Witness D] said the elevator door opened and a male Black in a blue robe starting yelling 'Fucking white crackers'." ... "[witness D] stated, 'the guy was pissed, angry out of his mind' when he referenced the demeanor of the male Black"
"[witness E] said prior to the shooting he received a phone call from [friend], a fraternity brother at Florida State University, to inform [witness E] as to [decedent's] mental state, [friend] stated, 'something was wrong with him, and he is not okay'. [Witness E] received the call from [friend] requesting [witness E] conduct a well-being check because he had a close relationship with [decedent] and local to [decedent]. [Witness E] described his fear that [decedent] may 'jump from the building'."
W/D [Reporting Detective] spoke with the Cook County States Attorney's Office Assistant States Attorney... and presented the facts of this case. After reviewing the facts of this investigation, ASA... Rejected Charges for First Degree Murder at 1354 hours. W/D [Reporting Detective] requests this case be placed into an Exceptionally Clear Closed (Other Exceptional) Bar to Prosecute status.

Eyewitness Video of Abnerd Joseph

Video of Abnerd Joseph on 14 September 2023
Audio Transcription
Abnerd Joseph: "[unintelligible] motherf****g [unintelligible] kill me... [unintelligible]... oh my god... [unintelligible]... laugh at this shit n****r. This whole time n****r, I'm over here thinking that they can kill me n****r. Bullets can't do shit to me. Bullets can't do shit to me. N****r, I'm all powerful! You know what, [unintelligible]"

Smith v. Charles, et al.

Smith v. Charles, at al., Case No. 2024-L-010547, Circuit Court of Cook County, First Amended Complaint
Smith v. Charles, at al., Case No. 2024-L-010547, Circuit Court of Cook County, First Amended Complaint (PDF)
Summary
This defamation lawsuit alleges that Defendants Delbert "Jay" Charles, individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Abnerd Joseph, deceased, Bryan Bien-Aime, Asheley Joseph, Jenna Joseph Kelly, and Nick Joseph, made slanderous and extrajudicial statements regarding the death of Abnerd Joseph, attempting to influence public opinion and criminal proceedings.

Motion to Dismiss

Smith's Motion for Dismissal, Case No. 2024-L-005346, Delbert J. Charles vs. Sudler and Company, et. al.
Smith's Motion for Dismissal, Case No. 2024-L-005346, Delbert J. Charles vs. Sudler and Company, et. al. (PDF)
Summary
Garrett Smith states through his attorneys that Plaintiff's allegations are "made from whole cloth -- and is wholly at odds with the record of evidence."

Illinois ARDC Rules of Professional Conduct Regarding Trial Publicity

Illinois ARDC Rules of Professional Conduct 3.6 Regarding Trial Publicity
"... a lawyer may make a statement that a reasonable lawyer would believe is required to protect a client from the substantial undue prejudicial effect of recent publicity not initiated by the lawyer or the lawyer’s client."
This page provides summaries and links to publicly referenced materials. Readers should consult the original documents for full context.
Site Map 2b946c7e66de3528